Afghanistan vs Least developed countries: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Afghanistan
0.2634 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Least developed countries
0.1574 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
10th
Least developed countries rank
10th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Least developed countries
0.20.40.60.8199020072025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.2634 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1574 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.106 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.7 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3587 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1348 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Afghanistan
2010s 0.224 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2062 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0178 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Afghanistan
2020s 0.2876 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1718 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1158 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Afghanistan or Least developed countries?
Afghanistan, at 0.2634 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1574 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Afghanistan and Least developed countries?
0.106 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Least developed countries?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Least developed countries rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Afghanistan ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Least developed countries: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/afghanistan/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Afghanistan vs Least developed countries: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.