Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Tanzania, United Republic of
19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
19,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
122nd
Uruguay rank
119th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Uruguay
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k198320032023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 19,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 518 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 119th of 191 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 6,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,383 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,040 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 9,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,875 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 14,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 18,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,533 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,028 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Tanzania, United Republic of or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 19,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 19,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay?
518 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 119th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/uruguay/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.