Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Sudan
7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
161st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196919962023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Sudan ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 8,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 8,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan, at 7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Sudan ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.