Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Turkey: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 90,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 75,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Turkey's figure about 6.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th and Turkey ranks 35th of 46 groups.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 42,606 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 38,325 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 1990s | 5,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 48,348 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 42,913 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2000s | 8,371 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 54,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 46,590 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2010s | 11,557 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 74,531 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 62,974 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2020s | 14,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 89,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 75,607 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 90,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turkey?
- 75,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turkey?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Turkey rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 34th and Turkey ranks 35th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.