Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs Turkey: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 90,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 75,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Turkey's figure about 6.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Turkey ranks 35th of 46 groups.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 42,606 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 38,327 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 1990s | 5,434 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 48,348 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 42,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2000s | 8,370 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 54,961 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 46,592 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2010s | 11,556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 74,531 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 62,975 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
| 2020s | 14,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 89,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 75,609 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 90,011 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Turkey?
- 75,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Turkey?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and Turkey rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Turkey ranks 35th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.