South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

South Africa
8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
157th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
156th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • South Africa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 73 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

South Africa ranks 157th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 5,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,644 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 6,311 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,143 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 8,233 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,176 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,057 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), South Africa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
73 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
South Africa ranks 157th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.