South Africa vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

South Africa
8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
157th
Sudan rank
160th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • South Africa
  • Sudan
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

South Africa ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 160th of 191 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 6,498 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,663 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 8,233 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 34.79 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), South Africa or Sudan?
South Africa, at 8,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between South Africa and Sudan?
860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
South Africa ranks 157th and Sudan ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/sudan/">South Africa vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.