Oman vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Oman
9,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
154th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
156th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Oman
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199820102023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 9,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Oman ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 2,393 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 4,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,143 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 984.85 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 8,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,176 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Oman or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Oman, at 9,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Oman and Turks and Caicos Islands?
860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Oman and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Oman ranks 154th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Oman vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.