OECD members vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

OECD members
20,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
26th
Rwanda rank
29th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 86,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 5.2 times OECD members's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 16,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,893 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,822 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 17,455 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,427 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,972 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 19,301 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,807 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 20,323 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102,466 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82,144 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), OECD members or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 107,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 20,568 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between OECD members and Rwanda?
86,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Rwanda?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
OECD members ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/rwanda/">OECD members vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.