Nigeria vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nigeria
138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
118,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria rank
17th
Switzerland rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nigeria
  • Switzerland
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k198120022023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 118,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Switzerland, a difference of 20,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Switzerland ahead.

Nigeria ranks 17th and Switzerland ranks 20th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 27,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 113,956 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 86,015 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 62,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 108,522 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,784 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 109,347 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 115,234 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 134,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 114,065 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Nigeria or Switzerland?
Nigeria, at 138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 118,691 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nigeria and Switzerland?
20,257 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Switzerland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Nigeria and Switzerland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nigeria ranks 17th and Switzerland ranks 20th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/nigeria/switzerland/">Nigeria vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.