New Zealand vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

New Zealand
32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
29,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
88th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sao Tome and Principe
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197720002023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2,353 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

New Zealand ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 191 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 25,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,180 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 28,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,417 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,601 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 31,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,795 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), New Zealand or Sao Tome and Principe?
New Zealand, at 32,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 29,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe?
2,353 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
New Zealand ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/sao-tome-and-principe/">New Zealand vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.