Namibia vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Namibia
1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
189th
Zambia rank
187th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 189th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1980s 678.91 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,237 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 557.82 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 814.62 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 692.12 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 1,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,622 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 531.27 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1,021 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 458.88 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 1,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 483.45 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Namibia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Namibia and Zambia?
196 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Namibia ranks 189th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.