Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Mozambique
6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
161st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Mozambique
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 475 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mozambique ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1,407 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,693 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2,987 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,664 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 568.09 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 6,131 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 136.22 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Mozambique or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
475 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zimbabwe?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Mozambique ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zimbabwe/">Mozambique vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.