Mauritania vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Mauritania
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 1,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 184th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 887.52 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 862.5 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 25.02 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 725.75 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,040 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 314.01 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 1980s | 883.05 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,237 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 353.68 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 1990s | 1,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 450.67 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 2000s | 959.75 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,622 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 662.55 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,276 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 204.14 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,572 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 45.24 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Mauritania or Zambia?
- Mauritania, at 1,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Mauritania and Zambia?
- 409 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zambia?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Mauritania ranks 184th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.