Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Low & middle income
41,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
12th
Singapore rank
13th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Singapore
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 41,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 119,358 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.9 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 12th and Singapore ranks 13th of 46 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 7,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 252,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 244,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 9,761 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 385,829 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 376,068 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 13,327 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 398,748 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 385,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 17,075 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 218,503 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 201,428 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 22,838 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 130,206 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 107,368 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 31,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 139,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 108,302 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 39,465 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 158,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 119,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Low & middle income or Singapore?
Singapore, at 160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 41,412 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Low & middle income and Singapore?
119,358 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Singapore rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Low & middle income ranks 12th and Singapore ranks 13th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/singapore/">Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.