Libya vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Libya
1,020 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
190th
Namibia rank
189th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
05001.0k1.5k198020012023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,020 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 11 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Namibia ahead.

Libya ranks 190th and Namibia ranks 189th of 191 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 792.27 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,141 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 348.62 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 1,029 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,021 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8.49 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 915.88 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 127.46 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Libya or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1,031 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,020 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Libya and Namibia?
11 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Libya ranks 190th and Namibia ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.