How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Latvia

14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway

14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

138th

Norway rank

137th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

Latvia
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 204 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Norway ahead.

Latvia ranks 138th and Norway ranks 137th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1990s	9,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	10,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	922.26 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	11,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	11,001 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	839.91 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	14,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	14,805 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	463.55 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Norway
2020s	15,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	16,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	309.65 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Latvia or Norway?: Norway, at 14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Latvia and Norway?: 204 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?: Latvia ranks 138th and Norway ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/norway/">Latvia vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.