Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Kazakhstan
3,797 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation
3,775 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
178th
Russian Federation rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Russian Federation
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 3,797 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3,775 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation, a difference of 22 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 178th and Russian Federation ranks 179th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 2,410 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 90.58 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 2,425 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,696 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 270.82 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s 3,229 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,143 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 86 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 3,875 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,646 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 228.55 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Kazakhstan or Russian Federation?
Kazakhstan, at 3,797 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 3,775 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
22 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Kazakhstan ranks 178th and Russian Federation ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/russian-federation/">Kazakhstan vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.