Jordan vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Jordan
27,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
26,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
100th
Malawi rank
101st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Jordan
  • Malawi
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196719952023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 27,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 26,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Malawi ahead.

Jordan ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 101st of 191 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 5,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,705 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 6,548 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,361 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 813.25 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 8,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,748 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 11,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,689 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 21,166 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,042 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 875.56 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 25,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Jordan or Malawi?
Jordan, at 27,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 26,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Jordan and Malawi?
556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malawi?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Malawi rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Jordan ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 101st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/malawi/">Jordan vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.