Jamaica vs Other small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Jamaica
102,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Other small states
16,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
31st
Other small states rank
31st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Other small states
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196619942023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 102,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Other small states, a difference of 86,008 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 6.2 times Other small states's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.

Jamaica ranks 31st and Other small states ranks 31st of 191 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Other small states Difference Ahead
1990s 85,728 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 71,878 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 70,043 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,293 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 54,750 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 83,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,605 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 68,138 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 98,425 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,626 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 81,799 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Jamaica or Other small states?
Jamaica, at 102,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Other small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Jamaica and Other small states?
86,008 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Other small states?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Other small states rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Jamaica ranks 31st and Other small states ranks 31st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Other small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/other-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/other-small-states/">Jamaica vs Other small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.