Indonesia vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Indonesia
76,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
73,530 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
44th
Kiribati rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Kiribati
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 76,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,530 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 2,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Kiribati ahead.

Indonesia ranks 44th and Kiribati ranks 45th of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Kiribati Difference Ahead
1970s 20,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 50,329 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,033 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 25,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,314 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 33,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,048 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,128 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 41,885 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,059 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 60,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 59,783 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 969.94 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 74,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 73,158 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Indonesia or Kiribati?
Indonesia, at 76,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 73,530 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Indonesia and Kiribati?
2,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kiribati?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Kiribati rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Indonesia ranks 44th and Kiribati ranks 45th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/kiribati/">Indonesia vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.