IDA total vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

IDA total
21,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
111,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
25th
Pakistan rank
24th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • IDA total
  • Pakistan
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 111,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 89,757 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 5.1 times IDA total's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

IDA total ranks 25th and Pakistan ranks 24th of 46 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Pakistan Difference Ahead
1980s 7,767 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,042 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,275 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 9,569 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,596 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,027 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 13,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,776 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,123 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 17,837 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 71,077 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 21,102 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 106,708 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 85,606 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), IDA total or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 111,636 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 21,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between IDA total and Pakistan?
89,757 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Pakistan?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do IDA total and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
IDA total ranks 25th and Pakistan ranks 24th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/pakistan/">IDA total vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.