Iceland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Iceland
11,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
11,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
145th
Turkmenistan rank
147th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Iceland
  • Turkmenistan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199520092023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 11,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 11,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 722 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 145th and Turkmenistan ranks 147th of 191 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2010s 9,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,044 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 11,301 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,216 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,085 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Iceland or Turkmenistan?
Iceland, at 11,794 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 11,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Iceland and Turkmenistan?
722 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Turkmenistan?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Turkmenistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Iceland ranks 145th and Turkmenistan ranks 147th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/turkmenistan/">Iceland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.