IBRD only vs Nigeria: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

IBRD only
39,241 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
14th
Nigeria rank
17th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Nigeria
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,241 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 99,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 3.5 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Nigeria ahead.

IBRD only ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 17th of 46 groups.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Nigeria Difference Ahead
1980s 16,998 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,147 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,149 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 17,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 27,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 21,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 29,645 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 109,347 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 79,702 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 37,320 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 97,484 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), IBRD only or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 138,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,241 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between IBRD only and Nigeria?
99,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Nigeria?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Nigeria rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
IBRD only ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 17th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Nigeria: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/nigeria/">IBRD only vs Nigeria: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.