Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Hong Kong, China
157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
14th
Singapore rank
13th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 3,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 13th of 191 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 282,006 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 130,206 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 151,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 205,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 139,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 65,746 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 170,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 158,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 160,770 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
3,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 13th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.