Guyana vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Guyana
6,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
165th
Mozambique rank
164th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Guyana
  • Mozambique
2.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 165th and Mozambique ranks 164th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 4 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Mozambique Difference Ahead
1980s 2,536 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,407 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 3,441 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,675 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 4,306 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,987 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 5,199 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 353.42 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 5,723 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,131 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 408.01 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Guyana or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 6,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 6,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Guyana and Mozambique?
330 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mozambique?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Mozambique rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Guyana ranks 165th and Mozambique ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/mozambique/">Guyana vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.