Greenland vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Greenland
1,429 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
185th
Zambia rank
187th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Greenland
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196519942023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 1,429 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 202 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.

Greenland ranks 185th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,140 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,596 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 455.53 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 1,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 281.96 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 1,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 157.3 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Greenland or Zambia?
Greenland, at 1,429 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Greenland and Zambia?
202 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Greenland ranks 185th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zambia/">Greenland vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.