European Union vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

European Union
54,629 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
248,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
European Union rank
9th
Mauritius rank
6th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • European Union
  • Mauritius
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 248,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,629 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in European Union, a difference of 194,114 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 4.6 times European Union's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

European Union ranks 9th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 46 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 49,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 144,644 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 94,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 51,586 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 152,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 100,927 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 54,014 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 183,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 129,277 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 55,096 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 216,766 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 161,669 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), European Union or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 248,743 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,629 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in European Union as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between European Union and Mauritius?
194,114 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Mauritius?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do European Union and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
European Union ranks 9th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/european-union/mauritius/">European Union vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.