Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Europe & Central Asia
16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
107,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
28th
Japan rank
28th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Japan
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020062023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 107,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 91,055 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 6.4 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 28th and Japan ranks 28th of 46 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 11,914 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 159,786 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 147,872 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2000s 13,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 151,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 138,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2010s 15,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 128,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 112,757 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan
2020s 16,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 107,902 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 91,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Europe & Central Asia or Japan?
Japan, at 107,899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Japan?
91,055 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Japan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Japan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 28th and Japan ranks 28th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/japan/">Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.