Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Europe & Central Asia
16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
111,588 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
28th
Italy rank
25th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Italy
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199020062023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 111,588 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 94,744 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 6.6 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 28th and Italy ranks 25th of 46 groups.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 22,462 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 114,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,007 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2000s 13,296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 122,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 109,585 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2010s 15,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 121,747 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 106,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy
2020s 16,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 114,705 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 97,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Europe & Central Asia or Italy?
Italy, at 111,588 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Italy?
94,744 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Italy?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Italy rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 28th and Italy ranks 25th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/italy/">Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.