Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 120,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 95,336 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Philippines's figure about 4.7 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 19th of 46 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 101,615 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 57,370 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 44,245 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 30,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 63,170 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 32,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2000s | 15,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 85,861 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 70,831 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2010s | 21,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 111,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 90,124 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2020s | 25,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 119,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 94,399 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 120,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Philippines?
- 95,336 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Philippines?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2023.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Philippines ranks 19th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.