Eswatini vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Eswatini
14,720 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
134th
Norway rank
137th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Norway
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 14,720 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 134th and Norway ranks 137th of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 10,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,781 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 10,489 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,281 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,207 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 11,319 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,348 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,970 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 13,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,001 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,848 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 16,422 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,805 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 15,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,100 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 106.8 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Eswatini or Norway?
Eswatini, at 14,720 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 14,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Eswatini and Norway?
296 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Norway?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Eswatini ranks 134th and Norway ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/norway/">Eswatini vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.