Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Estonia
7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
159th
Zimbabwe rank
161st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Estonia
  • Zimbabwe
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k196919962023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,134 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 604.9 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 10,906 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,254 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 13,222 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,278 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,944 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 9,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,267 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,680 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Estonia or Zimbabwe?
Estonia, at 7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,000 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Estonia ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.