Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Estonia
7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
159th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
156th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Estonia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k199520092023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 159th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 13,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,933 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,458 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 13,222 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,143 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 9,947 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,176 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,771 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Estonia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 8,203 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,710 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
493 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Estonia ranks 159th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.