Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
41,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Slovenia rank
78th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Slovenia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 41,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 1,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Slovenia ranks 78th of 191 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 14,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,729 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 19,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 29,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,719 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,721 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 37,936 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 42,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 41,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and Slovenia?
1,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Slovenia ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/slovenia/">Ecuador vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.