Ecuador vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
39,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Romania rank
79th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 39,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 97 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Romania ranks 79th of 191 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 12,651 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,471 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2000s 19,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,591 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,977 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2010s 29,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,954 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Romania
2020s 37,936 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,858 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 922.38 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or Romania?
Romania, at 39,762 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and Romania?
97 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Romania ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.