Ecuador vs Republic of Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
36,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Republic of Moldova rank
83rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Republic of Moldova
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 36,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 2,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Republic of Moldova ranks 83rd of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 14,107 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Republic of Moldova
2000s 19,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,546 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,932 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Republic of Moldova
2010s 29,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,945 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,948 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Republic of Moldova
2020s 37,936 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,446 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or Republic of Moldova?
Ecuador, at 39,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 36,978 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
2,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Republic of Moldova?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Republic of Moldova rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Republic of Moldova ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Republic of Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/moldova/">Ecuador vs Republic of Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.