East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

East Asia & Pacific
70,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
236,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
5th
Israel rank
7th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Israel
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 236,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 70,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 166,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 3.4 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 5th and Israel ranks 7th of 46 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Israel Difference Ahead
1990s 30,595 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 153,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 122,632 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2000s 38,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 197,067 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 158,942 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2010s 53,526 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 217,388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 163,862 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Israel
2020s 66,437 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 222,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 156,201 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), East Asia & Pacific or Israel?
Israel, at 236,773 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 70,331 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between East Asia & Pacific and Israel?
166,442 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Israel?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Israel rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 5th and Israel ranks 7th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/israel/">East Asia & Pacific vs Israel: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.