Denmark vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Denmark
49,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
52,489 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
66th
Uganda rank
64th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Denmark
  • Uganda
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196619942023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 52,489 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 3,394 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 64th of 191 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 40,365 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,814 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 59,033 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,529 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 69,916 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,953 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,963 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 68,566 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,163 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 65,724 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 49,276 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Denmark or Uganda?
Uganda, at 52,489 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 49,095 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Denmark and Uganda?
3,394 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Uganda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Denmark ranks 66th and Uganda ranks 64th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/uganda/">Denmark vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.