Cuba vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cuba
16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
16,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
130th
Montenegro rank
131st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cuba
  • Montenegro
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 476 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 130th and Montenegro ranks 131st of 191 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 27,807 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,964 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,844 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 31,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 20,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,753 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cuba or Montenegro?
Cuba, at 16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cuba and Montenegro?
476 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Montenegro rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cuba ranks 130th and Montenegro ranks 131st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/montenegro/">Cuba vs Montenegro: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.