Cuba vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Cuba
16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
16,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
130th
Finland rank
129th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k197019962023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 16,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 130th and Finland ranks 129th of 191 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 29,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,115 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,333 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 42,814 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,289 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 29,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 28,070 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,334 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 28,277 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,852 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,425 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 31,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,610 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,485 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 20,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 17,365 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Cuba or Finland?
Finland, at 16,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 16,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Cuba and Finland?
279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Cuba ranks 130th and Finland ranks 129th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.