Congo vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Congo
2,651 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
1,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
181st
Suriname rank
183rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
1.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2,651 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Suriname ahead.

Congo ranks 181st and Suriname ranks 183rd of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 764.25 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,745 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 980.26 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 1,012 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,074 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 1,112 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,093 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 981.03 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 1,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 850.23 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 2,108 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,037 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 929.84 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 2,547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 630.64 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Congo or Suriname?
Congo, at 2,651 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,832 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Congo and Suriname?
819 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Congo ranks 181st and Suriname ranks 183rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.