China vs Viet Nam: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

China
135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Viet Nam
142,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
18th
Viet Nam rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • China
  • Viet Nam
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 142,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 7,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.

China ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 191 countries.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1980s 32,940 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,423 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
1990s 45,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 51,821 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,625 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2000s 64,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 81,212 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,637 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2010s 96,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 109,161 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,188 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam
2020s 126,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,132 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 142,687 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Viet Nam?
7,182 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Viet Nam?
39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do China and Viet Nam rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
China ranks 18th and Viet Nam ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Viet Nam: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/china/viet-nam/">China vs Viet Nam: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.