China vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- China
- Philippines
How they compare
China currently reports 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 120,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 14,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.
China ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 19th of 191 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,335 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 30,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 16,529 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 1970s | 19,576 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 43,571 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 23,995 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 1980s | 28,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 54,907 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 26,017 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 1990s | 45,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 63,170 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 17,975 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2000s | 64,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 85,861 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 21,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2010s | 96,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 111,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 14,280 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Philippines |
| 2020s | 126,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 119,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 7,293 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Philippines?
- China, at 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 120,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Philippines?
- 14,665 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- China ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 19th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.