China vs Late-demographic dividend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- China
- Late-demographic dividend
How they compare
China currently reports 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 37,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 97,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes China's figure about 3.6 times Late-demographic dividend's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 18th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 16th of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Late-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,335 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9,065 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 1970s | 19,576 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 12,707 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 6,869 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 1980s | 28,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 18,614 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10,276 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 1990s | 45,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 16,638 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 28,557 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2000s | 64,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 19,729 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 44,845 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2010s | 96,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 28,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 68,810 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2020s | 126,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 35,634 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 91,223 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Late-demographic dividend?
- China, at 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 37,877 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Late-demographic dividend?
- 97,628 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Late-demographic dividend?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- China ranks 18th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.