China vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- China
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
How they compare
China currently reports 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 110,001 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes China's figure about 5.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.
China ranks 18th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34,105 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 101,615 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 67,510 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 45,195 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 30,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 14,306 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2000s | 64,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 15,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 49,544 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2010s | 96,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 21,129 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 75,845 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2020s | 126,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 25,164 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 101,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- China, at 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,504 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- 110,001 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2023.
- How do China and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- China ranks 18th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.