How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?

29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Chile

13,521 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

140th

Latvia rank

138th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

Chile
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,521 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 140th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5,270 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	9,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	3,856 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	8,084 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	11,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	3,757 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	12,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	14,341 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	2,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	13,379 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	15,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	2,411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Chile or Latvia?: Latvia, at 14,220 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 13,521 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Chile and Latvia?: 699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?: Chile ranks 140th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.