Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Central Europe and the Baltics
38,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
15th
Hong Kong rank
14th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199520092023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 38,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 118,949 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 4.1 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and Hong Kong ranks 14th of 46 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 33,741 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 282,006 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 248,265 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 34,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 205,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 171,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 170,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 134,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 157,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 38,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong?
118,949 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and Hong Kong ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.