Central Europe and the Baltics vs China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 38,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 97,383 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes China's figure about 3.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
Across all 29 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and China ranks 18th of 46 groups.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34,214 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 49,867 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 15,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2000s | 33,741 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 64,574 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 30,834 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2010s | 34,684 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 96,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 62,289 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
| 2020s | 36,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 126,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or China?
- China, at 135,505 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 38,122 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and China?
- 97,383 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and China?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and China rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and China ranks 18th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.