Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Central African Republic
1,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
188th
Zambia rank
187th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Zambia
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zambia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 188th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,516 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 82.65 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 961.79 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,480 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 517.85 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 952.44 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 574.35 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Central African Republic or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Central African Republic and Zambia?
146 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zambia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Central African Republic ranks 188th and Zambia ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/">Central African Republic vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
237 places, 10,015 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.